Insight Analytical Note

Read

SEC Brings Standalone Custody Rule Enforcement Action

Background:

  • On August 1, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged an investment adviser(1) for failing to conduct the required independent verification—commonly referred to as a surprise examination—on client accounts over which the firm had custody and substantial control.
    • The firm had maintained custody over these accounts for approximately six years without obtaining the mandatory surprise exam.
    • As a result, the SEC imposed a civil monetary penalty of $50,000.

Takeaways:

  • Enforcement Without Investor Harm: This represents a standalone compliance enforcement action—there was no allegation of investor harm, underscoring the SEC’s emphasis on technical compliance even in the absence of misconduct or client loss.
  • Custody Rule Priority: The SEC continues to view the Custody Rule as one of the most critical regulatory requirements for investment advisers. This action highlights the agency’s commitment to enforcing this rule as a cornerstone of investor protection.

(1) In the Matter of Munakata Associates LLC